Petition Text: 22259-FA-NonDis-O
Understanding Petition Numbers
In reference to the apportionments system, I believe that
the system should be put on an optional basis. Each congregation should be
allowed to choose or reject sending apportionments of each particular item. If
they want to support the item based on the accountability and/or the perceived
good job it is doing, then they will support it. If an apportionment item does
not meet the expectations or wants of a congregation, then that congregation
should not have to support it. It is almost to the point of taxation without
representation. The apportionments system must be based first and foremost on
the needs of the local congregation.
General Conference Index |
PETS Index |
Petition Information Index
General Conference Webmaster: Susan Brumbaugh
PETS Creator: John Brawn
Petition Text: 22259-FA-NonDis-O
1996 United Methodist General Conference