I think that a good way to start is for religious people to agree that no human being has access to God's mind. Realizing that we do not have access to God's truth, we can start shaping a new world based on what we think is the best knowledge and wisdom human beings have acquired over the centuries.
Once we get past the Bible, perhaps then we could make additional changes, perhaps an Axiom 2 also not subject to proof. It is tragic when someone loses faith because of some terrible event in his or her life that makes it seem as if God does not care. Why not just assume that God does not care and let humanity learn to care and do the caring? Axiom 3: God loves everyone the same.
I do not like to be critical of The United Methodist Church, in particular, or the Christian church, in general, but I do wonder. Is it really Christian to create this rather complicated system of beliefs, which, I believe, causes many people much pain and suffering? Many theologians and preachers seem to have worked it out so that they can cling to and proclaim old beliefs with a clear conscience, but are they being honest when they proclaim doctrines that seem one way to their congregations while they themselves think of these doctrines in an entirely different manner? In church on Sunday, we solemnly proclaim creeds as if these creeds are absolutely true. Perhaps it would be more honest if these creeds were preceded by these words: "We do not know, and we cannot prove as true, but we believe..." and as an ending, we add for emphasis, "...but we do not know."
What I am suggesting is not too different from the way we actually live. I am merely suggesting that we bring into the open what we really believe instead of pretending to believe what we don't seem to believe.
General Conference Webmaster: Susan Brumbaugh
PETS Creator: John Brawn
Petition Text: 22412-DI-NonDis-O
1996 United Methodist General Conference